Last week Sarah Palin became the presumptive nominee to be the next vice president of the Republican party. Since then, an angry blog mob as well as a hard left leaning media has tried every concievable way of running Gov. Palin through the ringer.
I wanted to take a few minutes to discuss some of the objections.
AIP
The blogs and MSNBC have been eagerly discussing the possibility that Palin is a member of the Alaskan Independence Party.
First of all, even Palin's critics acknowledge this is not a proven fact, and even the person running the division of elections says it is not true.
Second, very few people have a knowledge of what the AIP means in Alaska politics. In 1990, when I was a senior in high school, Alaska had a gubenatorial election that had two main party nominees, both of which were more liberal and pro-choice. This was unacceptable to mainstream conservatives like myself. Those conservatives worked with the AIP to draft Walter Hickel as a nominee--a Republican that served in the Nixon administration. Thus, several Republicans, especially pro-life Republicans, developed relationships with the AIP machinery. This has disappated since then, as the AIP has once again returned to the lunatic fringe of conservatism/libertarianism.
Third, most people of both parties in Alaska are sympathetic with the AIPs stance that the government has overstepped its bounds in retaining between 80-90 percent of all land as federal lands. This becomes particularly sensitive as it relates to taxation of oil company windfalls. Currenly, the drilling in Prudhoe Bay is done on state land, and the state gets the tax on the oil companies for budget and permanent fund dividends. ANWR is on federally owned land, and right now the federal government is claiming 100 percent rights to oil royalties. Alaska citizens believe they should have 100 percent of those dividends for income made in their state.
All in all, most Alaskans dont affiliate with the AIP, but many of them agree with some of their more salient points. I suspect this is the case with Palin.
Teen Pregnancy
People really need to back off on this issue. The accusation that Sarah's child was really her daughters was rediculous. Everyone has family issues. Even politicians do not have perfect families. Even Obama says let it go. Let it go.
Liberal Sexism
There is much in liberal blogs about Palin simply being eye candy, and one well-known blog even refers to her as a VILF.
I do not deny that Palin does have some visual appeal, or even that this may be part of the consideration of having her on the ticket. The same could be said about Obama's success, but it rarely if ever is.
What I object to is that these are the same people who are militantly pro-choice to advocate for women, and then dismiss a serious nominee for Vice President as simply a sex object. It very hypocritical.
Political Backup
It is obvious that Palin needs back up on foreign policy. I think that the wisest move for McCain to consider is to name a Secretary of State with foreign policy experience in his acceptance speech at the Republican Convention this week. This is not without president. Bush did the same with Colin Powell in the 2000 election, and it worked for Bush. It may work for McCain as well.
HE WHO LOVES NOT WOMEN, WINE, AND SONG.... REMAINS A FOOL HIS WHOLE LIFE LONG---- MARTIN LUTHER
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Book Review of the Second Testament by Scot McKnight
The Second Testament: A New Translation By Scot McKnight IVP Press ISBN 978-0-8308-4699-3 Scot McKnight has produced a personal translation ...
-
Book Discussion: The Shack Overview Questions If you were to rank the book: THE SHACK on a scale of 1-5, what would you rate it and why woul...
-
Ok, so I am remiss on doing any real original posts leading up to this holiday season. With a job change and a new baby on the way, as well ...
3 comments:
Just got done watching the clip of her addressing the church she used to attend.
"Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God"
That my friend, is a deal breaker for me.
Great post, thanks for the break down.
David, I think that that prayer is clumsy, but I don't think it says that the war is mission from God. She seems to be praying that those in command, entrusted with the lives of our military men and women, would seek guidance from God before sending them out. At least, that's how it reads to me.
Kim, I may very well be guilty of over-interpreting what she is saying, and I know that this quote alone does not prove or disprove anything.
But from having been around Evangelicals most of my life, I know how what she says resonates with them. There is no doubt in their minds that God is on America's side, and Republican politicians have mastered the art of saying the right things and pushing the right buttons to get them to vote.
This is not to say that Dems don't do that, but in the last 20-30 years, invoking the name of God for political gain has been mostly the trademark of the GOP.
We often think that taking the name of God in vain goes very little beyond saying things like "God damn," and "Jesus Christ!"
That is simply not true.
Post a Comment