Thursday, November 17, 2011

Prayer for Today



You raised up Your Son, O God and seated Him at your right hand as shepherd and king who seeks what is lost, binds up what is wounded, and strengthens what is weak. Empowered by the Spirit, grant that we may share with others that which we recieved from your hand, to the honor of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

(From Revised Common Lectionary Prayers by the Committee on Common Texts)

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Book Review of Addiction and Virtue by Kent Dunnington

book cover

Addiction and Virtue
by Kent Dunnington
ISBN 978-0830839018
Intervarsity Press
Strategic Initiatives in Evangelical Theology
Reviewed by Clint Walker

If most of the books in the series of Strategic Initiatives in Evangelical Theology are like Addiction and Virtue by Kent Dunnington, then Intervarsity Press is going to have a critically acclaimed, best selling series of theology books on their hands. Addiction and Virtue is a brilliant, interdisciplinary approach to developing a theology of addiction that has a lot to say to the church about its witness in the world and its life together.

The thesis of Addiction and Virtue is profound. Put simply, Dunnington believes that both the model of disease and the model of choice when approaching addiction is insufficient in explaining the addictive condition. A disease model, taken to its logical end, takes away a sense of responsibility for the person experiencing the addiction, which in turn can sabotage an addicted person's ability to take responsibility for their addictive behavior. A choice model is limited in that fails to take into account the etiological factors that are outside of an addict's conscious control.

Drawing from the philosophy of Aristotle and the theology of Aquinas, Dunnington attempts to account for addiction through the category of habit. Using the language and categories of virtue and virtue ethics, Dunnington believes that the idea of habit accounts for individual agency and responsibility, as well other forces that drive addiction that may feel or actually be outside of an individuals conscious control. Habit is formed by decisions, but it is also formed and influenced by upbringing, and complex biophysical drives and functions that are not easily explained.

The understanding of addiction as habit also had meaningful implications for the church, and how people in the church approach one another. It also has profound implications for persons who identify themselves as addicts within local congregations, and how we provide care for them. The second half of this book addresses these implications in detail.

One of the most profound thoughts in this section of the book is the idea that "Addiction is in fact a kind of embodied cultural critique of modernity and the addict a kind of unwitting modern prophet" (p. 123). The rise of the idea of addiction, the prevalence of those claiming to be addicts, as well as the effectiveness of AA in dealing with addiction all have a lot to teach us about who we are as modern Americans. Specifically, dealing with addicts can help the church in dealing with the emotional and social needs that all sorts of people all around us experience--not just addicted persons.

What I find intriguing about the concept of addiction as habit is how it relates to the current language and philosophy of spiritual formation. Much of what we describe as spiritual formation is about the development of spiritually healthy habits through the exercise of what is commonly referred to as spiritual disciplines. Could recovery from addiction be thought of as a spiritual discipline? I certainly think it can. As a matter of fact, those seeking to develop holy habits could learn a lot from folks in the recovery movement.

I think this is an excellent book. It is a must read for those interested in pastoral care, philosopy, and/or spiritual formation. It is "outside the box" thinking that is sure to become a standard and classic in a theological understanding of addictive behavior.

(This book was provided by Intervarsity Press in exchange for an honest review).

Music Review of Goat Rodeo Sessions


After seeing this ensemble perform on the Colbert Report, I had to go out and buy the CD of the Goat Rodeo Sessions. I have not been disappointed. Yo-Yo Ma, Chris Thile (of Nickel Creek) and the crew have put together a wonderful album of excellent music.

I like to the Goat Rodeo Sessions it while I am working on something where I need to think. This album works well for this because it is extremely well-played, but not overpowering or overwhelming.

My favorite song on the album is Here and Heaven. Aiofe O'Donovan's voice is exquisite on this track, and blends well with Chris Thile's.

I would recommend this album to everyone, especially folks who love bluegrass or folk.

Prayer for Today


Lord, open unto me
Open unto me--light for my darkness
Open unto me--courage for my fear
Open unto me--hope for my despair
Open unto me--peace for my turmoil
Open unto me--joy for my sorrow
Open unto me--strength for my weakness
Open unto me--wisdom for my confusion
Open unto me--forgiveness for my sins
Open unto me--love for my hates
Open unto me--Thyself for myself
Lord, Lord, open unto me.

(St. Augustine, from Presbyterian Book of Common Worship, p. 23)

The Brand New Bloggie Plan



Every once in a while, I feel the need to be a little more structured with my blogging. Now is one of those times.

As most of my readers know, book reviews have become a more and more prominent feature on this blog. That will continue. I am hoping I can continue it at an accelerated pace. I have added a number of new publishers lately, and I am hoping to continue to grow that business through this blog.

But there are certain other elements that are features of this blog. I am going to share those things in a scheduled manner. Or....at least attempt to.  This is how the schedule will go:

Sunday:              Sermon/Church stuff
Monday:             Battle of the Bulge--weight loss journey
Tuesday:             Parenting Posts--about our parenting journey
Wednesday:        All things culture
Thursday:           Extra, Extra!--My thoughts on current events and other newsworthy items
Friday:                Friar Tuck's Faith--thoughts on life in ministry and faith.
Saturday:            All things Sports

Every day:          Devotional thoughts featuring the new Common English Bible

Monday, November 14, 2011

Funny cartoon I found (Thanks Scot McKnight)

Book Review of Bless Us, O God by Dorothy D. France

Bless Us, O God

Bless Us, O God: Services and Prayers for Special Days
by Dorothy D. France
ISBN 978-0-8272-0237-5
Chalice Press
by Clint Walker

Lately, as some of my readers may have noticed, I have been working on bringing together some prayer and devotional resources to add to my library. I recently ordered, Bless Us O Lord, and have gotten a chance to look it over. What I discovered was an excellent resource for church leaders, especially lay church leaders who might be charged with leading a meeting with a devotion, or planning a special worship service of some sort.

The book is separated into four parts. The first part has devotions for different moments of the Christian year.This includes moments such as Advent and Easter, and also less prominent moments in the church year Each devotion is followed by a brief prayer. The second part of the book has devotions and prayer for moments of the civic year, including holidays like New Year's Sunday and Labor Day Sunday. Then there are a few meditations for other "occasions" that may not show up on the calendar.

The final section of the book is an organization of special services at different occasions in the life of the church. Some of these services are unique to persons in the Christian Church/Disciples background. Many other services, in fact most of them, are useful in most denominational settings.


Some of the resources in Bless Us, O Lord I will find extremely helpful. Others I will probably not use. Where I will find this most helpful is as a resource to share with lay leaders in my congregation. There are several moments in the life of the church where lay leaders are called on to share devotional thoughts, and this is an easy plug and play resource for such events.

Bless Us O, Lord will be a helpful reference item on my bookshelf in my office. I imagine it will be an equally helpful resource for others.

(Chalice Press has given me this book in exchange for an honest review)

Saturday, November 12, 2011

It was only a matter of time: reflections on the Penn State child abuse scandal



When I was a junior in college, I got myself in a difficult situation with my team and my coaches. I did not intend to find this trouble, and I would have handled things much differently now. What did I do? I unintentionally brought the racial tension on our college football team out in the open. I did this by naively suggesting to another teammate that we discuss issues of tolerance racial issues in an "open forum" based upon some recent conversations I thought I had overheard. By the early morning hours, I was forced to coerce the person I knew of that was making racially tinged comments to out himself, and a campus wide drama insued.

The phrase that kept coming up regarding the issue to me, and with the coaches was that we needed to "keep this in the family" and that I was "trying to destroy" the coaches work and being a "gossip" by suggesting that it was an issue that needed to be addressed. Even the next spring, more than six months later, Head Coach Bill Bauer was scolding me for beginning this dialogue with my teammate. He again said that "we" needed to "keep things like this in the family", keep them quiet, and not be divisive.

The incident in question happened during a fun, celbrative event that happened before our game against the Friends University Falcons. Each year, the coaches would get out raw chicken meat, have players put the meat in their mouths, hanging down their chin, and then have the next teammate in the relay grab the raw chicken with their mouth from the other side of the chicken meat. The winning team did not have to do conditioning.

My junior year the coaches allowed anyone to opt out of the Falcoln relay who did not feel comfortable with it. Every African-American player, as well as one or two Whites and Hispanics declined to participate. A person in front of me mumbled something. I thought I heard him say a racial epithet. I asked him to repeat it. He said, "They are a bunch of lazy a** n*****s". I asked him to repeat a third time. He said the same thing.

In retrospect, what I should have done right then was either join my teammates who declined to participate, or chosen to physically assault my teammate for what he said. But I started doubting myself. After all, there were a number of other teammates around me that I respected that did nothing to respond. I am hard of hearing, I thought. Maybe I just missed it.

After my practice I thought that maybe this incident, even if I misheard it, would be a good starting point to discuss cultural differences. (Again, I was very niave). I went to a black friend who I trusted and considered a friend to discuss the possibilities of putting together this kind of educational/dialogical opportunity for my dorm. After all, I was an RA charged with putting together an educational program.

My friend gathered every black male on campus, and brought me into a classroom to discuss the issue an hour later. They wanted to know who had said the words to me, and they wanted to do violence to the young racist. When I said that wasn't my intention, they brought in Coach Kim Raynor, who told me I was making his life miserable and I should have known better than to cause problems. I negotiated a deal where the person could out himself and confess what he had done wrong by the next day to the coach, then the team. Which he did. He repented to his teammates. He continually tried to injure me with cheap shots during practice. The coaches did nothing about this though. They believed I deserved it. Why? "I did not keep it in the family."

For the rest of the year I recieved phone calls with death threats. People tried to run me over. I was ostracized by much of my team. All this on a "Christian" college campus of 500 people. All of this becuase I was trying to address racism, and I did not "keep things in the family".

"Keep things in the family" I came to understand meant two things. First, it meant keep things within the football famil, and then it meant to keep things within the "white family". I didn't say much about this incident to anyone on campus afterward. But somehow it was an open secret to many through other people's conversations.

What does this have to do with the Penn State issue? Everything.

From the first time I heard this "keep it in the family" language in the locker room, I heard it as the language of disfunction at best and abuse at worse. It suggested that knowlege should not be shared outside of the football family. And by "keeping secrets" you were protecting your "fooball family".

Keeping confidences can be healthy, especially on a football team. You do not want to leak personality conflicts on the team to the media, for example. Nor is it helpful to share the team's game plan publically. Keeping basic confidences and having loyalties, however, is different than keeping bad secrets.

Nearly every team has this "keep it in the family" approach. And while it sometimes produces loyalty toward a team and brings them together, this attitude can also be abusive and destructive.

I believe it is this "keep it the family" culture of keeping bad secrets to protect the institution that we are seeing at work at Penn State University. A graduate assistant sees what he believes to be sexual assault. He can hardly believe his eyes.

I imagine a number of questions going through his head. Am I seeing what I am thinking that I am seeing? Is that boy as young as he looks? Do I really want to investigate? Can I confront this respected football coach? What should I do? He was paralyzed with his concern, this much we know.

What does the young man do who sees what happened in that locker room? He calls his football coach dad. What does his football coach dad tell him to do. "Keep it in the family. Go talk to Joe Paterno. He will take care of it from there." So that is what the graduate assistant does.

What do the people in the program do? Isolate the man further from them? Yes, but they also strive to keep this incident "in the family" to protect the school and the program from the outside world. Why? Because nearly every football team functions on a bunker mentality. Nearly every team is coached from day one that it is these "80 men you go into battle" with against the world, and you better be loyal to them no matter what. And, when the team is led by a respected leader, you had better be even more loyal to him than to your own family. That is what you are coached, trained, and brainwashed to do in college football. Unless you think hard and resist this groupthink, like I tended to do as a college football player. I paid a dear price for it.

As a graduate assistant coach, the man should have confronted his former defensive coordinator. I understand people's anger. I also understand that what he did was what he was trained to do.

The way I see it, this make Joe Paterno all the more complicit in what happened at his school. He demanded absolute loyalty and a lot of power, but did not exercise his power to help the most vulnerable on his coaching staff or with the children in his community. And he has begun to reap what he has sown. Do I wonder whether Paterno was on top of everything at that point? Yes I do. But I also know that this abuse is not just about individual behavior, but a culture that college football coaches create which demand that "bad secrets" be kep "in the family".

The child abuse scandal is about more than a deviant running rogue in Pennsylvania. This Penn State scandal is a wakeup call about the dark-side of sports, and in this case specifically college football. I hope it is not just one school that is listening, but people in all kinds of sports throughout the country. There has to be a better way of engendering loyalty than demanding that everything is "kept in the family".


Friday, November 11, 2011

The Three Trees: A Traditional Folktale by Elena Pasquali, Illustrated by Sophie Windham




I have always loved the three trees story since I first heard it. And, with this new retelling and reillustrating the story I fell in love with this children's story all over again.

This story tells a story about three little trees. Each of them has a dream of what they want to be, and each of them has an idea about just how that might happen. Each of the trees gets chopped down, and does not seem to have their dreams come true. But then, through the life and work of Jesus, each of them discovers God's purpose and their dreams coming together in a way that is better than they had ever hoped or expected.

I always read this story to children in our church during Advent, because its themes of waiting and hope so clearly correspond to the message of the Advent season. It is also appropriate for the Easter or the Lenten season.

Until now, the only telling of this story is the one distributed by Cook Communications, told by Angela Hunt, and illustrated by Tim Jonke. Now, Lion Children's book has commissioned Elena Pasquali and illustrator Sophie Windom to retell the story in a slightly different and new way.

That this story should be retold by Pasquali should come as no surprise. Pasquali has a skilled, strong history of retelling traditional folktales for modern audiences, as well as retelling Bible stories in ways that children can understand.

Elena Pasquali does an excellent job with the text. It is evenly paced and readable.

What makes this book fascinating to me is the different kind of illustration that accompanies the text.

One thing that is unique to this version of the story is that each of the trees is a unique KIND of tree. Each of them have different bark and different leaves. This adds to the readers understanding of the "uniqueness" of each of the trees on the hill. Each of them were different kinds of trees, and thus were best suited for the different kinds of purposes they came to fulfill.

The artistic style of illustrator intrigued me. It reminded me a lot of Edward Hicks' depictions of biblical scenes in his artwork in pieces like "The Peaceable Kingdom" and "Noah's Ark". Windom uses color more pleasingly than Hicks, but the way she integrates animals into intriguing pastoral scenes is reminiscent of Hicks' work.

All in all, I would recommend grabbing a copy of this book. I hope it will be a treasured part of your families life they way it is in the life of our church congregation.

(This book was provided for me for free in exchange for an honest review by Kregel Publications)

Sunday, November 06, 2011

Seventh Commandment Sermon--Be Faithful


Be Faithful

As you turn our Bible passage, I think it would helpful to say something about the Ten Commandments as a whole. One of the criticisms that some people have about these commandments is that there are, they believe, worse things that someone could do than what is mentioned in the Ten Commandments. For example, many believe that forms of sexual assault are more grievous than adultery. Or they assert that not taking a day off is not nearly as much of a sin as abusing your wife and children.



And, if the good Lord left me to rank sins, I would probably have to agree with them about how they are ranked.



The thing is though, if we are looking at the Ten Commandments, we are not looking at the Top Ten worst sins. What are looking at, when we look at the Ten Commandments are commands that are basic in our life together. Instead of being exceptional or extreme, they are foundational and spiritually formational.



The Ten Commandments lay some basic stakes and build some basic fences. They create some basic moral boundaries for the people of God that lay the foundation for what they are about, who they are, and who they are called to be. Anyway…to our passage we are studying. God’s word says this.

 

1 And God spoke all these words, saying:

       2“I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.

       3“You shall have no other gods before Me.

       4“You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; 5 you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, 6 but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments.

       7“You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain, for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.

       8“ Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 10 but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. 11 For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.

       12“ Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the LORD your God is giving you.

       13“You shall not murder.

       14“You shall not commit adultery.

       15“You shall not steal.

       16“You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

       17“You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor’s.”


 

Judge Roy Moore of Etowah, County Alabama was sued by the ACLU and the Alabama Free Thought Association in 1995 for displaying the Ten Commandments on the Courtroom wall. A Montgomery County judge ruled that the judge must take down the display from his wall. The Supreme Court then issued a stay of that removal, and then the Governor issued a decree that the Ten Commandments would be able to stay up, and would be defended by the National Guard of Alabama if necessary.



At the same time one person wisely uttered, “Don’t worry about the Alabama legislature hanging up that display of the Ten Commandments there. Until they figure out a way to do something about that thing about adultery, those senators and representatives will want to keep those commandments in court, and as far away from them as possible.”



I have a pastor friend who used to go around telling a joke that never really took off. He said he had found proof that God must be a female. He would receive odd looks. “How did you do that?” someone would ask.



Because the Bible says, “Thou shalt not commit adultery,” he would respond. Half the people would moan. The other half would raise a scolding eyebrow and shake their heads, and then the conversation would awkwardly transition to the next subject.

 

The truth is, that although the command, “You shall not commit adultery” is pretty straight forward, it is not heeded as often most of us would hope it would be. Studies and surveys are all over the place, but the most reliable research tells us that somewhere around a little over 1/3 of men commit adultery at one point in their lives, and somewhere near 1/4 of women do the same. Which is not so many people that transgressors can say, “Everyone else is doing it”, but enough people that most of us might be alarmed.



There are a lot of people who seem to view marriages in our society like working their way through a baseball farm system. You know, you start with some minor league mate, then after a few years you find a way to marry up from single A to Triple A. Then eventually, the plan is with these people, to hit the big leagues with someone who is hot, kind, and well-financed, and stay with them for as long as you can last.



Martin Luther said with the previous commandment—thou shalt not kill—we are commanded to learn how to live next to our neighbor. With this command we are commanded to learn how to live with the one that lies next to us in bed. (That Luther was a pretty witty and earthy fellow)



The truth is, marriage is not an easy calling. It is difficult to commit your life to someone, to raise children with them, to share—your finances, your heart, your future, your life, and your bed with someone. It takes a lot of effort and a lot of God’s grace to have a strong, faithful marriage.



I think a lot of people struggle with marriage, and being faithful within the context of marriage because they do not understand these truths: that marriage is not easy, and that marriage is a life’s calling given to us by God.



Marriage is not easy. And it is not always the big things that will drive you apart. Sometimes it is the little things that will just drive you nutty. For my wife, I am sure there are many of these things that she puts up with by suffering silently. But, when she has the baby bundled up and is ready to head out the door and I cannot find my keys or my wallet, I know it tries her patience. And as I have shared with some of you, when I drop ice on the floor and she steps on that piece of ice 20 minutes later because I did not pick it up I can hear her groan from the living room.

 

Marriage is not easy, for the most part, though, because it forces us to be less and less selfish. In other words, a good marriage forces us to grow as people in ways that we might not be willing to do otherwise. Don’t take my word for it. Listen to God’s Word, in Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians.



21 submitting to one another in the fear of God.22 Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church; and He is the Savior of the body. 24 Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything. 25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, 26 that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, 27 that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish. 28 So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Lord does the church. 30 For we are members of His body,[b] of His flesh and of His bones. 31 “For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.”[c] 32 This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church. 33 Nevertheless let each one of you in particular so love his own wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.




Submitting is not easy! It means to surrender your wants and desires for the betterment and benefit of another. Submitting means choosing not to get what you want. And the Scripture says husbands and wives are to submit to one another. It goes on say that husband ought to give of himself for his wife in the same way Christ gave of himself for the church. That means self-sacrifically. And truly honoring and respecting one’s husband is not easy work—especially when it means you often need to do the thankless things to support your family that nobody ever appreciates.



You see, when we don’t remember that marriage is work, and it is difficult at times, then what we do is have this worldview that marriage is about making ME happy, ME being fulfilled, ME feeling good, ME getting the life that I want. We read romance novels or watch movies that promise happily ever after, and when we don’t experience our “ideal” relationship in marriage we look outside our marriage to fulfill our relational and emotional needs as well as our physical urges.



Let’s face it. There are times when most of us guys get tunnel vision. And we get involved in all our work and our little projects. And our wives can talk about their concerns over and over again, and we can just blow them off. And then you gals can easily get to the point where you feel alone and taken for granted. If you haven’t found ways to do the hard work that marriage requires at these times, it can be easy to be tempted to stray to someone who treats you like you are special and gives you attention.



And let’s face it. Those honeymoon years where you can lie in bed together all day can quickly move into times in our marriage when we have to try fit in our moments of marital bliss into narrow windows of time when we are not working, the children are asleep or out of the house, the dog isn’t barking at the bedroom door, and company has not dropped by. Even then, when you are more likely to smell like diaper cream than Chanel No. 5, and you still have breathe that smells like Ruffles and onion dip, that it can be tempting to have a wandering eye, and to forget that marriage takes effort, and things won’t be like this forever.



And it is being faithful to one another in moments like these and others like them, that we grow up. It is in this kind of life together with a person we have made promises to that we learn what it is like to be faithful, and to have someone be faithful to us. We learn what it is like to see ourselves with our many faults and shortcomings, and then look next to us and see someone who continues to love and care for us in spite of them. And we can look next to us and see someone who we have grown up with and grown old with, and know that you may not have gotten rich or done anything extraordinary, but you have created something beautiful simply by staying with one another, raising kids together, sharing life together, and truly becoming the “one flesh” that the Bible describes marriage as.




And when you commit adultery, you scar that beauty, that sense of safety, that experience of unconditional acceptance and love by chasing after some idealized experience that leads nowhere. What you do when you commit adultery is you begin to treat people in your life as objects to be used instead of gifts to be treasured. You become a taker instead of a giver. You become a human parasite, sucking the life out of everyone around you to feed your unrestrained appetites, and destroying their happiness and joy and your soul in the process.



And I am going to be as blunt as I can, so that there is no doubt about what I am saying. Don’t be deceived into believing that your sin will just be between you, your spouse, and whoever that person is you have on the side. You’re unfaithfulness to your marriage will affect your children’s ability to be happy and maintain healthy relationships when they are older. It will affect their sense of confidence and security in the world around them. Your hopping into someone else’s arms and someone else’s bed will affect the ability of coworkers and friends to trust you and respect you—whether you notice it or not. And it will ultimately make those issues that you are trying to escape from by going outside your marriage bigger problems and harder to deal with. Adultery is more destructive that most of us ever anticipate.

 

Yes marriage takes work. But marriage is also a call from God. The passage in Ephesians said that marriage mysteriously teaches us about the relationship of Christ and the church.



Here is what part of this is saying. One of the concepts that the Bible teaches us about is covenant. A covenant is a promise between two or more parties, designed to be a blessing to all parties involved. The Bible talks about God making covenants with humanity. It describes him being faithful to the covenant he made. He keeps his promises. It is for that reason we can trust Him. We can trust Him with our lives and our eternities because he keeps his promises and he is faithful.



Marriage is a promise between a man, a woman, and God where we make a covenant. And this covenant mirrors God’s covenant with humanity, and his faithfulness to those who have put their trust in Him. As we remain true to the covenant, both by doing the work marriage entails (by truly loving and giving to and respecting one another), and by avoiding unfaithfulness, we give witness to the faithfulness of God who brought us together.




You have seen it. You have seen that couple that has been married faithfully for 50 years. They are in a church basement or the senior center. People are standing up to celebrate them and their marriage as they sit at a table. Underneath the table cloth they are holding hands. They look at each other and smile. You notice that the longer that they are together, they more they look like they have always just belonged together. They have given one another the covenant love that they promised, and God’s covenant love has went with them. Someone stands up and says, “It is rare to see a marriage last this long these days”. People nod and smile. They know that this faithful marriage has been blessed by God’s grace. The couple has blessed many in the room in ways they have not even begun to imagine. They have been a blessing because they have been faithful to their promise. They have been faithful to their call from God to be a faithful husband and wife, and it has made all the difference.



And somehow, when you think about that faithfulness, you are struck by its beauty. And it is in those moments you are to remember that they did not learn about that self-sacrificing, beautiful, faithful love from the world. They learned about it from a man who lived a perfect life and was crucified in order to remain faithful to his promise to love and redeem sinners like you and like me. And that love and truth seems to make perfect sense all over again.

Saturday, November 05, 2011

40 Ways to Get Closer to God by Jerry MacGregor w/ Keri Wyatt Kent


40 Ways to Get Closer to God
By Jerry MacGregor w/ Keri Wyatt Kent
ISBN 978-0-7642-0918-5
Published by Bethany House Publishers
Reviewed by Clint Walker

When I recieved a book entitled "40 Ways to Get Closer to God" I was expecting a basic devotional with some simple inspiring thoughts. Or something along the lines of something to accompany "The Purpose-Driven Life". (After all, the cover looks similar, doesn't it?) When I ordered this book  I thought it would be a devotional that has some basic information about who Jesus is and what the Christian faith is all about. I was mistaken. This book has much more to offer than the typical "Our Daily Bread" devotional.

What "40 Ways to Get Closer to God" offers is a primer in practicing the spiritual disciplines for the average Christian persons. Starting with the discipline of servanthood, MacGregor challenges his readers to practice each of these time tested spiritual practices by taking on one very specific challenge each day. The idea is that, after 40 days of practicing the 40 ways (although these could be done by week), then the reader has experienced a variety of ways to draw closer to God.

Each of the chapters really is simple and really does offer acheivable goals in putting these spiritual practices to work. They are each about three pages long, and then at the end of each chapter there is a small place to journal and record a brief reflection about each experience.

As I read this book, I could not help but think this would be an excellent text to use with a Sunday School class or small group during Lent. Especially with new or undiscipled believers, it would give several people a chance to really find out how they best connect with God, and learn how to meaningfully grow closer to God in ways they had not imagined.

At the beginning of each chapter there is a quote. Nearly every one of these quotes was by one of my favorite contemporary communicators on spriritual formation. The author of this text knows the material on spiritual formation, but has made it accessable to everyone. No small feat!

This book will be  used in depth by me either with my family or in our church in the next year. I love it! I am sure if you give it a chance you will too. Good job Jerry MacGregor! I will be looking for more from you!

(I recieved this book from the publisher in exchange for an honest review)

Book Review of Reformation Commentary on Scripture--Vol. 10: Galatians, Ephesians edited by Gerald Bray


Galatians, Ephesians

Reformation Commentary on Scripture: Volume X
Edited by Gerald L. Bray
Intervarsity Press
Reviewed by Clint Walker


For the last several years, Intervarsity Press has published a set of Bible commentaries that have won critical acclaim. This wonderful series is the Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. In this set of commentaries, the editors of each volume bring together the best of the Church Fathers and other leaders of the early church.

Now, Intervarsity Press has begun the project of the Reformation Commentary on Scripture, which is a Bible commentary that highlights the best of the Reformation scholarship on Scriptural interpretation. Going through the whole Bible, each volume will highlight what the Reformers said about a particular passage or text on Scripture.

This is very exciting, because the Reformation brought about a revolution in Scriptural interpretation and insight. Much of the most significant theological work ever done was done during the Reformation era, especially if one is a Protestant Christian. And since the Reformation happened soon after the development of the printing press, writing of theology during the Reformation era was more plenteous that at any point before.

I just received a review copy of the first volume in the set from Intervarsity Press. It is a commentary on the Biblical books of Galatians and Ephesians. I could not be more impressed.

First of all, both the series introduction and the introduction to this specific volume are wonderful to read. Each could stand alone as both enjoyable reading and impressive scholarship apart from the commentary. I particularly enjoyed George bringing attention to the fact that good scholarship and pastoral ministry were not separate ventures in the Reformation Era. Most of the great Reformers were also leaders of local congregations, and both their theology and the way they communicated those beliefs were refined through that experience (p. xiv). Relatedly, “the post-Enlightenment split between the study of the Bible as an academic discipline and the reading of the Bible as spiritual nurture was foreign to the reformers. For them the study of the Bible was transformative at the most basic level of the human person: coram deo” (p. xv).

Also, it is fun to read the Reformers side by side with one another. For me, it was especially fun to see the contrast in tone and style between Calvin and Luther in regard to the book of Galatians. This contrast was exacerbated by kind of source material chosen, as Calvin’s commentaries were selected as his primary source material for this text, and Luther’s lessons to his classes were the primary texts from Luther quoted in this commentary. The result is the best of each person’s work. For Luther, that means that he reads as both thoughtful and earthy. In the case of Calvin, his work reads as methodical, logical, and academic, which is his strong suit.

I also like reading what I will call the “scoundrels” of the Reformation in this volume. By this term “scoundrels” I mean people like Tyndale and Erasmus who were influential in the Reformation for their own reasons, but were not highly regarded or well treated by the church as a whole.

It was also interesting how contemporary some of the Reformers sound even today. I think this is because in many ways the Reformation was about getting the gospel to the people, instead of doing theology and writing books for the benefit of the church and other clergy. For example, I appreciated Bugenhagen’s simple explanation of Ephesians 5:21 (and what follows), “Paul adds that each one should submit to the other in the fear of God, so that everyone will fear of God, so that everyone will fear God and believe his brother…and not claim to know more than he ought to” (p.381).


Although I loved this book, I was disappointed in the lack of diversity in the sources that were chosen. Most were either Lutheran or Reformed. There were very few from the Anabaptist tradition represented, for example. I hope this weakness is remedied in further volumes of this fine set of commentaries.

I would recommend, if you can afford it, to find a way to get this excellent inaugural volume in this fine new commentary series.  I have loved it. I know you will too.


Friday, November 04, 2011

Martin Luther on Prayer and Life


A human heart is like a ship on a wild sea, driven by the storm winds from the four corners of the world. Here it is stuck with fear and worry about impending disaster; there comes grief and sadness because of present evil. Here breathes a breeze of hope and of anticipated happiness; there blows security and joy in present blessings. These storm winds teach us to speak with earnestness, to open the heart and pour out what lies at the bottom of it.
(Martin Luther in The Contemporaries meet the Classics on Prayer, p. 40)

Wednesday, November 02, 2011

Review of the Common English Bible from Abingdon Press



I know what many of you that read this blog are thinking. What? Another Bible translation? Why would we need that?

The short answer is "Because language is always changing!".

The long answer is more complicated than it at first appears, and has a lot more to do with traditions and marketing than one might expect. This is not just the case with the CEB, but also with the NIV, the ESV, The Message and even the NKJV. This agenda not necessarily an easy thing for publishers to admit. It is in fact true; however, that the variety of translations that we find in American English has as much to do with a variety of intended audiences and purposes of the translation teams and publishers as it does with developments in our understanding or knowledge of the ancient languages.

The Background

The last few years have seen several new translations and paraphrases of Scripture come on the scene. More and more of these translations also have particular publisher with particular constituencies and certain presuppositions that they bring to the text. Some of these publishers have in turn have recruited certain Christian leaders in specific circles to promote and contribute to their study bibles. This is nothing new, but it has accelerated in recent years.

For example, Crossway Books has worked hard to get  the English Standard Version developed under their imprint. Then they brought in the "New-Calvinists" like John Piper and Mark Driscoll to endorse and contribute with the ESV Study Bible. Because the New Calvinists tend to be more technical and literal, it is a good match to partner them with a version that emphasizes verbal equivalence.

Thomas Nelson owns and markets the NKJV.

Recently, Zondervan has also updated the NIV to include many of the improvements found in the TNIV, including a greater emphasis on inclusive language for human persons.

Less recently, NavPress contracted with Eugene Peterson to translate THE MESSAGE, which is a paraphrase from the original languages and has gained a lot of popularity across theological and denominational lines--especially for devotional use.

It is into this world of translations and their connections with specific publishers and "cliques" of Christians that the Common English Bible was born.

How the Common English Bible was Born

Representatives from a number of different mainline publishers began gathering to develop in the Common English Bible in 2009. These publishers included Chalice Press, Pilgrim Press, Church Publishing Inc., Westminster John Knox Publishers, and Abingdon Publishers (from whom I received this review copy).

The Common English Bible Committee has several different goals. One of their goals was to produce a translation with a diverse number of English speaking scholars on board. This included people of different racial backgrounds, and people of a variety of denominational and theological backgrounds (from UCC to Nazarene to non-denominational and everywhere in between).

Another goal of this translation is to render it in inclusive language, especially as it concerns humanity. In this way the CEB is similar to the NRSV.

The CEB is different from the NRSV in that it is written for an contemporary, everyday audience with an eighth grade reading level. This is approximately the same vocabulary level as the USA Today newspaper.

Also unique about the CEB is the priority of its purpose of developing a version of Scripture that is easily read in worship. For the whole translation the publishers developed reading groups to help them develop clarity and ease of public reading by lay persons in public.

I cannot emphasize too much how important this final step is in making the CEB an excellent translation of Scripture for my use. This is especially true in mainline denominations, which put a higher emphasis on the public reading of Scripture than do evangelical groups.  I currently am forced to use NKJV in worship at my church per church policy. It reads so choppy and awkwardly, and I almost always feel like I have to explain what I just read in order to help people understand the basic story of the text I just shared. This would not be the case if I had the opportunity to read the CEB in worship.

Digging Deeper: My evaluation of the CEB with examples

Due  to the CEB's effort to be contemporary, there are several ways that the translation reads different than a standard denominational curriculum. To see how this works, it will be helpful to look at a few specific passages. Let us begin with one of my favorites: Ephesians 2:8-9.
In the NIV it reads like this:
8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast.

While in the CEB it reads like this:
 8 You are saved by God’s grace because of your faith.[a] This salvation is God’s gift. It’s not something you possessed. 9 It’s not something you did that you can be proud of.

In these verses let me point out a few differences in the passage:
  1. The CEB has simplified the sentence structure so that it does not need hyphens. It has broken down 1 long sentence into three short ones.
  2. The CEB intentionally uses contractions as part of the commitment it has to common speech.
  3. The CEB chooses "proud of" instead of "boast". Boast is not that common of a word in common speech. Pride is more so.
  4. The CEB reads more conversationally than the NIV, which reads more legal
Do I like all these changes? Sometimes. For worship reading and teaching I would often prefer the CEB. For study and even for some preaching and teaching, some more verbal equivalence in sometimes helpful.

One of the most criticized translations by the CEB has to do with translating "blessed" as happy. For me, that "blessed" word is essential for teaching what the text is like through preaching. I would not like "happy" at all. But it might be helpful for someone in another context.
Another criticism is the rendering of the term "justification". This is a little bit more of a challenge of the CEB when translating the passage, because there are a lot of arguments, which I do not completely comprehend, regarding the word "justification" and its meaning. The CEB, believing that the term "justification" is not necessarily an easy concept or vocabulary word, choses to simply render the term justify as "made righteous". If I want to preach a deep theological sermon, would I want to explain the more legal and theological term "justification"? Perhaps. But I do not have a problem with translating the term justification "made righteous" for those who are needing to read a smooth, easy to understand text.

Final Thoughts
I think the CEB is a fine translation of Scripture. Will I run out and encourage my church to replace its pew Bibles? Probably not. Will I eagerly encourage young believers and friends to read from the translation? I think I might!

Its strength is that it reads smoothly and incorperates mainline concerns as well as thoughtful evangelical concerns as well. I am all for inclusive language, so I love that about this translation.

There are a number of pleasing things about the Common English Bible's presentation. It uses maps from the National Geographic Society. It's cover, font, and text are put together in a classy way, which makes this new Bible a pleasure to stick my nose in. Some of the translation notes help with understanding the text a little better as well.

The CEB has accomplished its stated goals to be "Relevant, Readable, and Reliable". I hope it is used for years to come!

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Thought this was funny

The sermon to offend everyone....: Reflection on the Sixth Commandment


Thou shalt not kill. Four words. They sound pretty straight forward. The way that they we interpret these words have been anything but straight forward.

Thou shalt not kill. Four words. Moses received these words from up on high, but when he returned from the mountain, he found the Israelites worshipping a golden calf. When he discovered this, he sent out Levite priests to slaughter folks who had bowed the knee to this evil idol. Three thousand were killed that day. Even though God had just said, “Thou shalt not kill”.

Thou shalt not kill. Four words. Four words vigorously discussed and debated about in regard to what they mean to our lives together in our society. Many of our most contentious issues politically revolve around how we interpret this passage. How does the sixth commandment apply to things like birth control, abortion laws, our wars in Iraq and Afganistan, the execution of Ghaddafi, assisted suicide and the right to die movement, capital punishment, and other such issues?

Thou shalt not kill. Four simple words. And yet, by the time we get to the teachings of Jesus they are words that should guide us toward a life that is free from anger, revenge, score settling and violence.


So, what are we to make of the four simple words? How are they supposed to make their way into our hearts and lives? How are they to guide us toward a grace-filled, blessed life?

Furthermore, what do they really mean? What was God trying to say through them anyway? I have had a lot of questions in my life about those four little words.

And as I prayed about how to present this passage this morning, that is how I felt led to share this message with you today. I thought instead of me simply telling you what to believe in regard to this passage, I would have you join me on my spiritual and intellectual journey as I have sought, and continue to seek, clarity in relationship to this small, succinct, and very wise command.

I realize as I do this, you and I may not come out at the end of this process with the same attitude and perspective. That is ok. We are Baptists. We are not required to agree. But as I hope as I share how I have worked through these issues you will respect where I am coming from, and I will work on, if we disagree, showing you the same respect in return.
And I hope you will know that I come to this issue from a deep love of Scripture and faithfulness to Jesus, and a desire to be faithful obiedient to it no matter what the cost.
 

So, I have to tell you, starting off, a little bit more about who I was growing up. I was, from a young age, a person who often tried to avoid a fight, but more often than not found myself in physical altercations. How this happened is complex, but I think I can explain it. First, I was always, growing up, a little bit larger than people my age. I was at one hundred pounds by third grade, around 160 by sixth grade, and just under 200 pounds before 9th grade. And, that was all before I hit my growth spurt, entered puberty, and really started growing.

I was also, as you may have noticed in a more refined way now, a tender-hearted, sensitive soul. I was an am a people pleaser. And, for the most part a conflict avoider.

At the same time, I had this temper, that would flare up more often than I would like it to, which would come out through angry words screaming, and once in a while through some more physical way, such as breaking things or hitting something, and sometimes through tears as well.

All of this made me a ripe target for the young punks who wanted to move up in respect and fear of their fellow classmates through taking on the big guy. Which in turn, meant that I would often end up in fights. I was taught never to start a fight, which was a rule I almost always complied with. I was also taught that if someone tried to start a fight, I had every right to finish it. Which is something I learned how to do if necessary.

I have to admit, it did feel really good to go toe to toe with someone and win in a fight. In fourth grade, a guy was picking on a friend of mine. I told him if he wanted to pick on someone, he should try someone his own size. He punched me. I punched him in the nose. Blood spurted everywhere. I broke his nose on the first punch. It was such a rush to bring bodily harm to someone. And when the principal confirmed the story—that I acted in self-defense—I received no punishment whatsoever, and quite a few “atta-boys” from friends and family.

As I grew older, I channeled most of my aggression through sports. I played football. I wrestled. I learned that I played better when I could get myself in a really angry and violent toward everything I hated about my life, and then funnel that anger and that violence toward the person I was competing against. My senior year in high school I had a guy in a headlock, put his arm over his mouth and nose so he couldn’t breathe. He was gasping for air and finding none, like you do when you are underwater for too long and trying to hold your breathe. Finally I pinned him. Having his breathe, and in many ways his life, in my hands, it was such a high. I still have not forgotten it.

All this to share this, growing up I did not question much of the violence I saw around me. In war. In fights. In politics. In anything. I did not want to go into the military because I did not want to have some strange man screaming and yelling at me. I knew I would end up yelling right back at him over and over again until I was discharged or punished in some extreme way. Besides, I was too big to do more than one or two pull ups. I knew it would not be good.

I was also pro-life. Have been for as far back as I can remember.

Flash forward to seminary from there. I had played four years of football. I had finished two years of seminary. I was taking an ethics class. The ethics class required us to take on one issue for our research paper. I did not want to do much with environmental ethics and faith, because to be honest I was over the leftist propaganda on that issue. I had already been pretty clear on several other issues. I ended up studying the ethics of war and peace. It wasn’t a hot button issue by 1997. With my pick-up truck and short hair I certainly could not have been mistaken for a hippie, and with my portly, informal appearance I could hardly be mistaken for the militaristic type. The Cold War had ended. Our military was not in Iraq. This made this a perfect issue to study objectively. No drama. No agenda. Just trying to learn what the word of God says. Turned out I did not just learn a lot about war and peace, I learned a lot about what the Bible said about what the Catholic Church calls a “culture of life” in general.

The Creation story shows us that God values life. He created it. Human life was brought into being by God’s Word. After the fall, we see brother murder brother, and this was strongly condemned. By the time we get to Noah and the Ark, what we see is a world that is becoming increasingly violent. This violence was a large reason why the flood was sent.

Throughout the law, not only is there the command “Thou shalt not kill”, but there are all sorts of laws that protect life, including the life of an unborn child. Besides that, there are ritualistic laws that teach the people of Israel to honor life. And to protect the lives and the well-being of even those that are not from our country but live among them, or people who are too poor to have the resources to protect themselves. These laws were radically compassionate for their time.

Yet, in the Old Testament law, we also see a place for capital punishment of many crimes. In addition we see commands for warfare, and in the midst of warfare. And practices of warfare that go beyond anything we would think appropriate today. Things like killing not only every warrior, but every man, woman, child, and animal of one’s enemies. If you like reading some gory stuff, just read your Old Testament stories.

At the same time, though, you often see that the Scripture sees those who do violence, even if they do so in justifiable causes, to be considered less pure. Ceremonially this is definitely true. David couldn’t build the temple because he had too much blood on his hands, but Solomon was given permission by God to do so.

You also see God at times how God delivers his people from military threat without them having to go into battle. This is the case when the Israelites escaped Israel through the Red Sea. 2 Kings 19 tells a story about how God went and killed 180,000 people in their sleep when a mighty army was attacking Israel, and the people did not even have to fight against those folks. There is this underlying stream of thought that comes to fruition in Zecheriah 4:6…which says, “not by might, not by power, but by my Spirit says the Lord”.

So we come to the New Testament with this command that tells us “don’t kill” and this violent world that the Israelites lived in. We see them having a high regard for life, but also involved in many violent endeavors, like many of the nations around them were as well.

In the middle of this world, comes Jesus. Jesus, in Matthew 5-7, begins to speaks some pretty radical words. Words like these, from the New International Version:

21 “You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You shall not murder,[a] and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ 22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister[b][c] will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, ‘Raca,’[d] is answerable to the court. And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.  23 “Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother or sister has something against you, 24 leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to them; then come and offer your gift. 25 “Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still together on the way, or your adversary may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison. 26 Truly I tell you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny.

And these:

    38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[h] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. 41 If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. 42 Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you. 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[i] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

These passages, and others, seem to say that the command to not murder was to lead us as far away from violence as possible. It was, as a matter of fact, designed by God not to simply keep us from killing one another, but if we believe Jesus it was designed to keep us from hating one another, wishing harm on one another, wanting vengeance on another, or anything like that. All of this seems to run counter to the Jesus way.

So what does “Thou shalt not kill” mean? For me, as I continued to study, it meant what it said, and much more. Because the command was not only a call to not kill, but an invitation to a life in the Spirit where I would and could be a person of grace, peace, reconciliation, and love. In other words, I believe in being completely pro-life.


In regard to abortion, this meant that I believed that abortion was wrong. I discovered in fact that early church was actively involved in efforts to prevent abortion and infanticide from early in its history. Often rescuing children that were abandoned because of their gender or their disability, and taking them into their home, Christians had a powerful witness in the ancient world because they were the original right to lifers.

Note, however, that the early church’s pro-life activities were amazingly pro-active. They took children in that nobody wanted. They raised them at their own expense. They didn’t make their pro-life stand simply a political stand. They made it a lifestyle and a costly commitment.

The New Testament is remarkably silent regarding capital punishment. It seems clear thought that when God does have an opportunity to offer someone life instead of death, he certainly does it. He tells the woman who is about to be executed in John 8 to go and sin no more. He speaks of himself as one who wants to set captives free. And in America, as Chuck Colson wisely points out, our standards for capital punishment are in some ways not as stringent as Scripture’s, which calls for eyewitnesses to a crime of murder in order for it to be a death-penalty case, for instance.

In regard to issues regarding end of life, I don’t believe in assisted suicide. Looks like murder to me according the Scriptures. Having said this, I don’t think artificially keeping people alive by machines is necessarily mandated by Scripture either. The Bible says that for “everything there is a season”. It is not our place to play God by taking a life prematurely, or trying to use machines to extend it indefinitely.

And in regard to issues of war and peace, I must again listen to the one who said, “Love your enemies” and “turn the other cheek”. Although this issue is difficult for many to wade through, and many Christians disagree, I personally could not participate in military service in good conscience.

This is, a stance, interestingly enough, that was also endorsed by the early church until the government took authority over the church at the time of Constantine.

Don’t get me wrong. I do not condemn others who have. In fact I admire their courage, commitment and others-centeredness in their service. And I believe our nation should do everything to offer the best health care and social and emotional support for people who have put their lives on the line on behalf of our country. The gospel is a gospel of mercy and compassion that extends to all.

But when I ask myself, “Who would Jesus want me to kill?” I can only answer, “Nobody!” Even in the case of war.

I would rather be overly-obedient to the commands like “Love Your Neighbor”, “Love Your Enemy”, and “Thou shalt not kill” than to compromise my conscience in this regard. And I would rather die or suffer for standing for what I believe in this regard than to simply go along with the crowd instead of what I believe Jesus preaches. Some of you may believe this stance to be weak or cowardly. I believe it to be both courageous--especially in the middle of our culture of violence—and right.

I also believe it to be in line with the model of Jesus, who when arrested could have led armies to free himself, his friends, and his countrymen. Instead Jesus allowed foreign mercenaries to hang him on a cross to do the bidding of corrupt political leaders. And he bled. And he died. He died so that we could life—eternal life.

And he gave us the mission of going out into the world with that same self-sacrificial life and that same hopeful message. What is that message? That life is a gift given to us by God. And it is a good gift. And that God loves each of us so much that his will is that we “should not perish, but by believing inherit eternal life”.

Reformation Commentary of the Bible: Old Testament Volume XIII--Psalms 73-150

Reformation Commentary of the Bible: Old Testament Volume XIII--Psalms 73-150  Edited by Herman J. Selderhuis IVP Academic ISBN 978-0-8308-2...