Today I was reading through one of the many books that I have yet to finish--The Trinity by Roger Olson and Christopher Hall.
In particular, I was reading a summary of the development of Trinitarian theology from the patristic era. As I was reading, it suddenly occured to me that it is very easy to become a heretic in one's trinitarian theology. Especially, in the patristic era, or the era of the early church fathers.
At the same time, it is also interesting to note what theological heresies continue to rear their ugly heads over and over again. In particular, I was struck by the human tendency to present the Old Testament God and the New Testament God as almost two different Gods, or two different kinds of Gods. According to this line of thinking, the Old Testament God is Rambo, and the New Testament God is more like Mr. Rogers. There are a million variations of how people communicate this "divine personality change" between the Old Testament and the New Testament. But this understanding of God is unbiblical, heretical, and immoral.
In the early church (or patristic period) this idea was advocated by Marcion, who as a result had a number of beliefs that were very close to gnosticism, and were rejected by the early church councils. Iraneus says of Marcion's beliefs that the Old Testament and New Testament God are different that one cannot "Divide God into two, calling one good and the other just. For in doing so he (Marcion) destroys the divinity of both." (Hall and Olson, p.27) As Gerald O'Collins correctly states "The Jewish Creator God is identical with the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ". (The Tripersonal God, p. 97).
The OT God v. NT God theological approach creates a problem because it allows us to quickly dismiss the bulk of God's Word, or a least not give it as strong of an emphasis. Yet, a quick study of the New Testament demonstrates that the early church used their Old Testament as their primary Scriptures, and through the Old Testament texts were able to see how the message of Jesus was consistent with the God revealed in Scriptures (namely the Old Testament).
Relatedly, even though this was less a concern of the church fathers, this "divine personality change" divorces Jesus from his Hebrew context. And when we divorce Jesus from who he was ethnically, an ancient Jewish peasant/laborer, then it becomes very easy to misunderstand Jesus. Specifically, it can lead to anti-semitical theology and behavior. If you doubt this, study the theology of 18th-early 20th century German theology, which both puts less of an emphasis on the Trinity, and Jesus' Jewish heritage. This poor theology in many ways led to the holocaust.
Ok...enough of me rambling...sometimes I just need to write things down or I forget what I was thinking about.
HE WHO LOVES NOT WOMEN, WINE, AND SONG.... REMAINS A FOOL HIS WHOLE LIFE LONG---- MARTIN LUTHER
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Book Review of the Second Testament by Scot McKnight
The Second Testament: A New Translation By Scot McKnight IVP Press ISBN 978-0-8308-4699-3 Scot McKnight has produced a personal translation ...
-
Book Discussion: The Shack Overview Questions If you were to rank the book: THE SHACK on a scale of 1-5, what would you rate it and why woul...
-
Ok, so I am remiss on doing any real original posts leading up to this holiday season. With a job change and a new baby on the way, as well ...
5 comments:
Very informative, Clint. Any books on how the Canonization of Scripture you recommend?
Wow! Say MORE!!!
I agree that teaching the consistency of God is important and yet lacking. In part I think b/c we (American evangelicals - especially lay evangelicals) have let easy stereotypes of OT and NT teaching replace careful study and thus lost sight of Christ as judge of the world, for example.
I'm preparing to teach an OT survey at church and this post is a helpful reminder to address this. Thanks.
I'm curious how balance the tension between a seemingly more violent God of the OT (holy wars, eye for an eye, etc) with a seemingly less violent God of the NT (turn the other cheek, etc)? How would you react to Bruggeman's statement that "God is a recovering abuser"?
@ David--I cannot really think of any off of the top of my head
@ matt--how exciting. Are you using a curriculum or putting it together yourself?
@ jason--I answer this is two ways. One is that God meets us where we are at. We grow and we change. And as a human race, God may reveal more of himself to us as we go along, but that does not mean he is a different God. He reveals more of his truth to us as we go along.
Secondly, I would say that God does not become less violent in the Old Testament, he just gets his followers to be less violent. That is a small but significant difference. Read Revelation. Read the story of Annias and Saphira and compare to Achan in the Old Testament.
Thirdly, I would say that there is a lot of grace, compassion, and lovingkindness of God in the Old Testament. We can miss it if we try to fit God into "bad cop" in the Old Testament and "good cop" in the New Testament.
Post a Comment